Where two negligent defendants both could have caused the plaintiff's injury but it is impossible to identify which did, the burden shifts to each defendant to disprove causation.
tort
High Court of Australia held a religious organisation vicariously liable for sexual abuse by a priest, recognising a relationship akin to employment sufficient to ground vicarious liability.
High Court of Australia held that the peak indebtedness rule does not apply when assessing unfair preferences under s 588FA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
An employer owes a duty to take reasonable steps to protect an employee from psychiatric injury caused by vicarious trauma, and may breach that duty by failing to act on obvious warning signs.
Get a detailed analysis of Summers v Tice and how it applies to your situation.
Explain Summers v Tice