Australian law does not recognise loss of chance as a head of damages in medical negligence; causation must be established on the balance of probabilities.
tort
High Court of Australia held a religious organisation vicariously liable for sexual abuse by a priest, recognising a relationship akin to employment sufficient to ground vicarious liability.
High Court of Australia held that the peak indebtedness rule does not apply when assessing unfair preferences under s 588FA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
An employer owes a duty to take reasonable steps to protect an employee from psychiatric injury caused by vicarious trauma, and may breach that duty by failing to act on obvious warning signs.
Get a detailed analysis of Tabet v Gett (No Loss of Chance) and how it applies to your situation.
Explain Tabet v Gett (No Loss of Chanc...