← All Authorities
Singapore claim forms

Tan Chin Seng v Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd

[2003] 3 SLR(R) 307
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2003
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Representative proceedings require that all members of the represented class share a common interest and the same cause of action against the defendant.

Key Principle

representative proceedings; common interest and same cause of action requirement

Area of Law

procedure

Related Cases

Getswift Ltd v Webb (2022) 276 CLR 553

High Court of Australia held there is no power to make a common fund order in favour of litigation funders at the interlocutory stage of a class action.

UBS AG v Tyne (2018) 265 CLR 77

Anshun estoppel bars relitigation where it was unreasonable not to raise the issue in earlier proceedings; re-litigation may also constitute abuse of process.

Palmer v Ayres (2017) 259 CLR 478

High Court of Australia held the reflective loss principle (Prudential Assurance rule) does not apply in Australia, permitting shareholders to recover losses independently of the company.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Tan Chin Seng v Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Tan Chin Seng v Raffles Town C...