A therapist owes a duty to warn an identifiable third party when the therapist determines or should determine that the patient poses a serious danger to that person.
tort
High Court of Australia held a religious organisation vicariously liable for sexual abuse by a priest, recognising a relationship akin to employment sufficient to ground vicarious liability.
High Court of Australia held that the peak indebtedness rule does not apply when assessing unfair preferences under s 588FA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
An employer owes a duty to take reasonable steps to protect an employee from psychiatric injury caused by vicarious trauma, and may breach that duty by failing to act on obvious warning signs.
Get a detailed analysis of Tarasoff v Regents of the University of California and how it applies to your situation.
Explain Tarasoff v Regents of the Univ...