← All Authorities
Singapore uncategorised

TDT v TDS

[2016] 4 SLR 145
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2016
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Singapore Court of Appeal considered the threshold for establishing unreasonable behaviour as a fact proving irretrievable breakdown of marriage under the Women's Charter.

Key Principle

Women's Charter; divorce; unreasonable behaviour; irretrievable breakdown; threshold for fact-finding

Area of Law

family

Related Cases

Masson v Parsons (2019) 266 CLR 554

A known sperm donor may be recognised as a legal parent under the Family Law Act 1975, overriding inconsistent State presumptions, with paramount consideration given to the best interests of the child.

Stanford v Stanford (2012) 247 CLR 108
Stanford v Stanford (Just and Equitable Threshold) [2012] HCA 52

A property settlement order under s.79 FLA may only be made if it is just and equitable to alter existing property interests, which must be determined as a threshold question.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of TDT v TDS and how it applies to your situation.

Explain TDT v TDS