← All Authorities
Singapore quincecare dutyexpress termsexclusion and limitation clauses

Teo Wai Cheong v Crédit Industriel et Commercial

[2013] 3 SLR 573
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2013
StatusBinding authority

Summary

A bank's Quincecare duty and liability for unauthorised trades may be excluded or modified by conclusive evidence clauses in the contractual documentation.

Key Principle

Quincecare duty; unauthorised trades; bank's duty to verify; contractual terms; conclusive evidence clause

Area of Law

banking

Related Cases

Westpac Banking Corporation v Lenthall (2019) 272 CLR 1

A bank owes a duty of care to guarantors to take reasonable steps to ensure they understand the nature and effect of the guarantee under the Code of Banking Practice.

AUSTRAC v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2018] FCA 930

CBA liable for systemic AML/CTF Act contraventions including failure to report suspicious matters and threshold transactions via intelligent deposit machines, resulting in $700 million civil penalty.

Paciocco v ANZ Banking Group Ltd (Full Federal Court) (2015) 236 FCR 199

Full Federal Court held that bank late payment fees were not penalties or unconscionable under consumer protection law as they bore a genuine pre-estimate of loss or legitimate commercial interest.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Teo Wai Cheong v Crédit Industriel et Commercial and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Teo Wai Cheong v Crédit Indust...