← All Authorities
United Kingdom serviceanonymity open justicenorwich pharmacal

Tian v Refinitiv Limited Wenjun Tian v Refinitiv Limited

[2026] EWHC 1418 (KB)
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtHigh Court of Justice, King's Bench Division
Year2026
StatusPersuasive authority

Key Principle

In a Norwich Pharmacal claim a private hearing and anonymity will be refused absent compelling justification, because open justice and the Article 10 right to report court proceedings generally outweigh a claimant's Article 8 reputational interests; and a claim form not served within the four-month period under CPR 7.5 is not validly served and cannot be remedied by relief under CPR 6.15, 6.16 or 7.6.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)
Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)
Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Tian v Refinitiv Limited Wenjun Tian v Refinitiv Limited and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Tian v Refinitiv Limited Wenju...