← All Authorities
United Kingdom
meaningmalicious falsehoodfact or opinion
Tinkler v Ferguson
[2018] EWHC 3563 (QB)
Key Principle
In a libel and malicious falsehood claim the natural and ordinary meaning of a publication is determined by the single-meaning rule by reference to the hypothetical reasonable reader, and that determination governs whether the words are seriously defamatory at common law and whether they are statements of fact or opinion.
Area of Law
General
Related Cases
Ask CommonBench about this case
Get a detailed analysis of Tinkler v Ferguson and how it applies to your situation.
Explain Tinkler v Ferguson