← All Authorities
United Kingdom rome iilimitationforeign law

Tipples J in Pandya v Intersalonika General Insurance Co SA

Pandya v Intersalonika General Insurance Co SA [2020] EWHC 273 (QB)
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtHigh Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division (Tipples J)
Year2020
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

Where the applicable law under the Rome II Regulation is foreign law, a foreign-law rule that requires both filing and service of the originating process to interrupt limitation is a matter of prescription/limitation governed by the lex causae under article 15(h) of Rome II, and cannot be downgraded to a mere procedural matter governed by the lex fori; if the claim form is not served within the foreign limitation period the claim is time-barred.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)
Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)
Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Tipples J in Pandya v Intersalonika General Insurance Co SA and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Tipples J in Pandya v Intersal...