← All Authorities
Singapore Leading Case uncategorised

TQ v TR

[2009] 2 SLR 961
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2009
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Court of Appeal set out structured approach to just and equitable division of matrimonial assets under s.112 Women's Charter, contrasting global assessment and classification methodologies.

Key Principle

Division of matrimonial assets; structured approach to just and equitable division under s.112 Women's Charter; global assessment versus classification methodology

Area of Law

family

Related Cases

Masson v Parsons (2019) 266 CLR 554

A known sperm donor may be recognised as a legal parent under the Family Law Act 1975, overriding inconsistent State presumptions, with paramount consideration given to the best interests of the child.

Stanford v Stanford (2012) 247 CLR 108
Stanford v Stanford (Just and Equitable Threshold) [2012] HCA 52

A property settlement order under s.79 FLA may only be made if it is just and equitable to alter existing property interests, which must be determined as a threshold question.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of TQ v TR and how it applies to your situation.

Explain TQ v TR