← All Authorities
United States Leading Case strike out and summary judgment

TransUnion LLC v Ramirez

594 U.S. 413 (2021)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year2021
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Each class member must demonstrate a concrete injury for Article III standing; a bare statutory violation without concrete harm is insufficient.

Key Principle

To establish Article III standing for damages, each class member must demonstrate a concrete injury; a bare statutory violation without concrete harm is insufficient.

Area of Law

procedure

Related Cases

Getswift Ltd v Webb (2022) 276 CLR 553

High Court of Australia held there is no power to make a common fund order in favour of litigation funders at the interlocutory stage of a class action.

UBS AG v Tyne (2018) 265 CLR 77

Anshun estoppel bars relitigation where it was unreasonable not to raise the issue in earlier proceedings; re-litigation may also constitute abuse of process.

Palmer v Ayres (2017) 259 CLR 478

High Court of Australia held the reflective loss principle (Prudential Assurance rule) does not apply in Australia, permitting shareholders to recover losses independently of the company.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of TransUnion LLC v Ramirez and how it applies to your situation.

Explain TransUnion LLC v Ramirez