← All Authorities
United States us whitebook bridge

Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo

577 U.S. 442 (2016)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
Year2016
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Representative/statistical evidence may support (b)(3) predominance where appropriate under governing substantive law

Key Principle

Representative/statistical evidence may support (b)(3) predominance where appropriate under governing substantive law

Area of Law

Civil Procedure — FRCP 23 class actions

Related Cases

Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc. 573 U.S. 258 (2014)

Securities fraud-on-the-market presumption and certification — Basic presumption remains, subject to rebuttal evidence at certification

Comcast Corp. v. Behrend 569 U.S. 27 (2013)

To establish (b)(3) predominance, damages methodology must measure damages attributable to the certified theory of liability

Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp. 527 U.S. 815 (1999)

Strict limits on limited-fund mandatory classes under Rule 23(b)(1)(B)

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphake...