← All Authorities
United States Leading Case nature of fiduciary relationshipspecific performance

Varity Corp v Howe

516 U.S. 489 (1996)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year1996
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Under ERISA, an employer acting in a fiduciary capacity is subject to fiduciary duties, and individual equitable relief is available under s 502(a)(3) for breaches of those duties.

Key Principle

ERISA; fiduciary duty when employer acts in fiduciary capacity; individual equitable relief available under s 502(a)(3)

Area of Law

employment

Related Cases

Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd (2022) 275 CLR 165

Employee/independent contractor characterisation is determined by the legal rights and obligations in the written contract, not the totality of the relationship.

ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd v Jamsek (2022) 275 CLR 215

HCA confirmed that employee/contractor distinction is determined by contractual terms alone, rejecting the multi-factorial totality-of-relationship test.

WorkPac Pty Ltd v Rossato (2021) 271 CLR 456

A casual employee's status is determined by the contractual terms at engagement; regularity of work pattern does not transform casual employment into permanent employment.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Varity Corp v Howe and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Varity Corp v Howe