A parent company may owe a duty of care to those affected by its subsidiary's operations where it exercises sufficient control or assumes responsibility, and jurisdiction may be established via an anchor defendant.
tort
High Court of Australia held a religious organisation vicariously liable for sexual abuse by a priest, recognising a relationship akin to employment sufficient to ground vicarious liability.
High Court of Australia held that the peak indebtedness rule does not apply when assessing unfair preferences under s 588FA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
An employer owes a duty to take reasonable steps to protect an employee from psychiatric injury caused by vicarious trauma, and may breach that duty by failing to act on obvious warning signs.
Get a detailed analysis of Vedanta Resources PLC v Lungowe and how it applies to your situation.
Explain Vedanta Resources PLC v Lungow...