← All Authorities
United Kingdom Leading Case remoteness

Victoria Laundry (Windsor) Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd

[1949] 2 KB 528
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtEngland and Wales Court of Appeal
Year1949
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Remoteness of damage in contract is determined by what was reasonably contemplated by the parties as liable to result from the breach at the time of contracting.

Key Principle

remoteness refined; reasonable contemplation at the time of contracting

Area of Law

Contract — Breach and Remedies

Related Cases

Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi [2015] UKSC 67

The UKSC reformulated the penalty clause rule, replacing the Dunlop test with a legitimate interest test asking whether the clause is extravagant or unconscionable relative to that interest.

Transfield Shipping Inc v Mercator Shipping Inc (The Achilleas) [2008] UKHL 48

Remoteness of damage in contract may depend on whether the defendant assumed responsibility for the type of loss, not merely reasonable contemplation.

Golden Strait Corporation v Nippon Yusen Kubishika Kaisha (The Golden Victory) [2007] UKHL 12

Where a charterparty was repudiated, damages are assessed by reference to subsequent events that would have terminated the contract early, reducing the award accordingly.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Victoria Laundry (Windsor) Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Victoria Laundry (Windsor) Ltd...