← All Authorities
United Kingdom Leading Case uncategorised

Williams v Compair Maxam Ltd

[1982] ICR 156
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtEmployment Appeal Tribunal
Year1982
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Established the Compair Maxam principles requiring fair and objective criteria for redundancy selection to avoid unfair dismissal findings.

Key Principle

Compair Maxam principles for fair redundancy selection

Area of Law

Employment

Related Cases

Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Barker (2014) 253 CLR 169

Australian law does not recognise an implied duty of mutual trust and confidence in employment contracts, departing from the UK position in Malik v BCCI.

Byrne v Australian Airlines Ltd (1995) 185 CLR 410

The High Court considered the implication of terms into employment contracts, including whether a term of good faith or fair dealing could be implied at common law to constrain unfair dismissal.

Tadjudin v Bank of America NA (2016) 19 HKCFAR 690

An employer must not exercise contractual discretion irrationally or in bad faith; HK leading authority equivalent to Braganza on implied limitations on contractual discretion.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Williams v Compair Maxam Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Williams v Compair Maxam Ltd