← All Authorities
United States Leading Case easementsrule of law

Winters v United States

207 U.S. 564 (1908)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year1908
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Federal reservation of land for Native American use impliedly reserves sufficient water rights to fulfil the purposes of the reservation, establishing the prior appropriation doctrine.

Key Principle

Reserved water rights doctrine; federal reservation of land impliedly reserves sufficient water for purposes of reservation; Native American water rights

Area of Law

environmental

Related Cases

Sharma v Minister for the Environment [2022] FCAFC 35

Full Federal Court overturned trial judge and held no novel duty of care is owed by the Environment Minister to Australian children when approving fossil fuel projects under climate change concerns.

Bushfire Survivors for Climate Action Inc v Environment Protection Authority [2021] NSWLEC 92

NSW Land and Environment Court held the EPA had a statutory duty under the POEO Act to develop environmental protection policies addressing climate change, enforceable by judicial review.

Gloucester Resources Ltd v Minister for Planning (Rocky Hill Mine) [2019] NSWLEC 7

First Australian court decision refusing mine approval on climate change grounds, holding that a project's greenhouse gas contributions are a material consideration in planning decisions.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Winters v United States and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Winters v United States