← All Authorities
Singapore Leading Case interim injunctions american cyanamidguarantees and indemnities

Wishing Star Ltd v Jurong Town Corp

[2008] 2 SLR 909
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2008
StatusBinding authority

Summary

In Singapore, unconscionability is a separate and recognised ground (distinct from fraud) to restrain a beneficiary from calling on a performance bond by injunction.

Key Principle

Performance bond; unconscionability as ground to restrain call on performance bond in Singapore; separate from fraud exception

Area of Law

banking

Related Cases

Westpac Banking Corporation v Lenthall (2019) 272 CLR 1

A bank owes a duty of care to guarantors to take reasonable steps to ensure they understand the nature and effect of the guarantee under the Code of Banking Practice.

AUSTRAC v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2018] FCA 930

CBA liable for systemic AML/CTF Act contraventions including failure to report suspicious matters and threshold transactions via intelligent deposit machines, resulting in $700 million civil penalty.

Paciocco v ANZ Banking Group Ltd (Full Federal Court) (2015) 236 FCR 199

Full Federal Court held that bank late payment fees were not penalties or unconscionable under consumer protection law as they bore a genuine pre-estimate of loss or legitimate commercial interest.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Wishing Star Ltd v Jurong Town Corp and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Wishing Star Ltd v Jurong Town...