← All Authorities
United Kingdom authority to litigatestandingdirectors and shares

Zoya Ltd v Ahmed

[2016] EWHC 1981 (Ch)
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtHigh Court of Justice, Chancery Division
Year2016
StatusPersuasive authority

Key Principle

Where a company's standing to sue is challenged on the ground that the individual who instructed solicitors to issue proceedings was neither a shareholder nor a validly appointed director, the party asserting authority must prove it; here, on the trial of preliminary issues, the purported controller was held neither legally entitled to the company's shares nor validly appointed a director, so the proceedings were issued without authority.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

TNLC & Anor v Gambling Commission & Ors [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)
Aabar Holdings S.A.R.L. and others v Glencore Plc and others [2026] EWHC 877 (Comm)
Waterside Class Limited v Mowi ASA & Ors [2026] CAT 32

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Zoya Ltd v Ahmed and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Zoya Ltd v Ahmed