← All Authorities
Singapore Leading Case construction interpretation

Zurich Insurance (Singapore) Pte Ltd v B-Gold Interior Design & Construction Pte Ltd

[2008] 3 SLR(R) 1029
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2008
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Singapore Court of Appeal endorsed the contextual approach to contractual interpretation, permitting extrinsic evidence under conditions derived from s 94 Evidence Act.

Key Principle

contextual approach to contractual interpretation; extrinsic evidence admissible under certain conditions

Area of Law

Contract and Interpretation

Related Cases

PH Hydraulics & Engineering Pte Ltd v Airtrust (Hong Kong) Ltd [2017] 2 SLR 129

Limitation-of-liability clauses in commercial contracts are enforceable and subject to ordinary principles of contractual construction in Singapore.

Y.E.S. F&B Group Pte Ltd v Soup Restaurant Singapore Pte Ltd [2015] 3 SLR 1187

Plain meaning of contractual words prevails unless surrounding context clearly demands otherwise; commercial sense alone cannot displace clear text.

Sembcorp Marine Ltd v PPL Holdings Pte Ltd [2013] 4 SLR 193

Court of Appeal laid down three-step framework for implying terms in fact: identify a gap, establish necessity, and formulate the specific term to be implied.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Zurich Insurance (Singapore) Pte Ltd v B-Gold Interior Design & Construction Pte Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Zurich Insurance (Singapore) P...