← All Authorities
United States us whitebook bridge

Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly

550 U.S. 544 (2007)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
Year2007
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Rule 8 requires factual allegations plausibly suggesting entitlement to relief; retires Conley “no set of facts” as the sufficiency standard

Key Principle

Rule 8 requires factual allegations plausibly suggesting entitlement to relief; retires Conley “no set of facts” as the sufficiency standard

Area of Law

Civil Procedure — FRCP 8 9 12 pleadings and motions

Related Cases

Ashcroft v. Iqbal 556 U.S. 662 (2009)

Plausibility standard applies to all civil cases; disregard conclusory allegations; context-specific judgment using experience and common sense

Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. 551 U.S. 308 (2007)

PSLRA scienter pleading — strong-inference standard in securities fraud (heightened statutory regime interacting with Rule 9)

Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N.A. 534 U.S. 506 (2002)

Employment-discrimination complaint need not plead a prima facie case under the McDonnell Douglas evidentiary framework

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly