← All Authorities
United States Leading Case statements of case

Bell Atlantic Corp v Twombly

550 U.S. 544 (2007)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year2007
StatusBinding authority

Summary

A federal complaint must plead sufficient factual matter to state a claim that is plausible on its face, replacing the prior Conley v Gibson no-set-of-facts standard.

Key Principle

complaint must plead facts showing the claim is "plausible on its face"

Area of Law

Federal Pleading Standard

Related Cases

Ashcroft v Iqbal 556 U.S. 662 (2009)

Plausibility pleading standard from Twombly applies to all federal civil actions; conclusory allegations not entitled to assumption of truth.

Loper Bright Enterprises v Raimondo 603 U.S. ___ (2024)

Chevron U.S.A. v NRDC overruled; courts must independently interpret statutes and may not defer to agency interpretations solely because of statutory ambiguity.

SEC v Jarkesy No. 22-859 (2024)

The Seventh Amendment right to jury trial applies to SEC administrative fraud proceedings seeking civil penalties, rendering ALJ adjudication of such claims unconstitutional.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Bell Atlantic Corp v Twombly and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Bell Atlantic Corp v Twombly