← All Authorities
Singapore valuation datedisclosure

BPC v BPB

BPC v BPB and another appeal [2019] SGCA 3; [2019] 1 SLR 608
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore Court of Appeal
Year2019
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

In ancillary matters, the pool of matrimonial assets is generally determined as at the date of interim judgment and valued as at the date of the ancillary hearing, with departures requiring cogent reasons; and an adverse inference for non-disclosure will be drawn only where there is a substratum of evidence establishing a prima facie case and the party had particular access to the concealed information.

Area of Law

family

Related Cases

UYQ v UYP UYQ v UYP [2020] SGCA 3, [2020] 1 SLR 551
VET v VEU VET v VEU [2020] SGHCF 4; [2020] 4 SLR 1120
VDZ v VEA [2020] SGCA 75

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of BPC v BPB and how it applies to your situation.

Explain BPC v BPB