← All Authorities
United States Leading Case jurisdiction

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co v Superior Court of California

582 U.S. 255 (2017)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year2017
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Specific personal jurisdiction requires a connection between the forum, the defendant, and the particular claims at issue; non-resident plaintiffs in mass-tort suits cannot rely on co-plaintiffs' contacts.

Key Principle

specific jurisdiction requires claim-specific connection; mass-tort non-resident plaintiffs barred

Area of Law

Personal Jurisdiction

Related Cases

Ford Motor Co v Montana Eighth Judicial District Court 592 U.S. 351 (2021)

Specific personal jurisdiction exists where a defendant's forum contacts 'relate to' the plaintiff's claims, even without strict causation between those contacts and the injury.

Daimler AG v Bauman 571 U.S. 117 (2014)

General personal jurisdiction over a corporation is limited to forums where it is 'essentially at home', typically its place of incorporation or principal place of business.

Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations SA v Brown 564 U.S. 915 (2011)

General personal jurisdiction over a foreign corporation requires its affiliations with the forum state to be so continuous and systematic as to render it essentially at home there.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Bristol-Myers Squibb Co v Superior Court of California and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Bristol-Myers Squibb Co v Supe...