← All Authorities
United States Leading Case forum non conveniens

Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations SA v Brown

564 U.S. 915 (2011)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year2011
StatusBinding authority

Summary

General personal jurisdiction over a foreign corporation requires its affiliations with the forum state to be so continuous and systematic as to render it essentially at home there.

Key Principle

general jurisdiction requires continuous and systematic contacts

Area of Law

Personal Jurisdiction

Related Cases

Ford Motor Co v Montana Eighth Judicial District Court 592 U.S. 351 (2021)

Specific personal jurisdiction exists where a defendant's forum contacts 'relate to' the plaintiff's claims, even without strict causation between those contacts and the injury.

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co v Superior Court of California 582 U.S. 255 (2017)

Specific personal jurisdiction requires a connection between the forum, the defendant, and the particular claims at issue; non-resident plaintiffs in mass-tort suits cannot rely on co-plaintiffs' contacts.

Daimler AG v Bauman 571 U.S. 117 (2014)

General personal jurisdiction over a corporation is limited to forums where it is 'essentially at home', typically its place of incorporation or principal place of business.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations SA v Brown and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operatio...