← All Authorities
Hong Kong advisory dutymis sellingexclusion clauses

Chang Pui Yin v Bank of Singapore Ltd

Chang Pui Yin v Bank of Singapore Ltd [2017] 4 HKLRD 458, CACV 194/2016 (Court of Appeal)
JurisdictionHong Kong
CourtHong Kong Court of Appeal
Year2017
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

A bank-customer relationship does not of itself give rise to a duty to advise; whether an advisory duty has been assumed is assessed objectively from the contractual terms and surrounding circumstances, and standard non-reliance/non-advisory clauses may, depending on their construction and statutory controls, validly exclude or define the scope of any such duty.

Area of Law

banking

Related Cases

Yeung So Lai v Art Excel Limited [2025] HKCA 957 [2025] HKCA 957
The Bank of New York Mellon v XJ International Holdings Co Ltd [2025] HKCA 481
[2024] HKCFI 2302 [2024] HKCFI 2302

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Chang Pui Yin v Bank of Singapore Ltd and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Chang Pui Yin v Bank of Singap...