← All Authorities
United Kingdom Leading Case frustrationconditions warranties innominatecharterparties

Classic Maritime Inc v Limbungan Makmur SDN BHD

[2019] EWCA Civ 1102
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtEngland and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Year2019
StatusBinding authority

Summary

A party cannot invoke a force majeure clause unless it can show it would have performed but for the force majeure event; the 'but for' causation test applies.

Key Principle

The 'but for' test applies to force majeure clauses: even if a force majeure event occurred, the party cannot rely on it if they would not have performed the contract in any event.

Area of Law

shipping

Related Cases

Compania Sud Americana de Vapores SA v Hin-Pro International Logistics Ltd (2016) 19 HKCFAR 586

An exclusive jurisdiction clause in a bill of lading may be enforced by anti-suit injunction, balancing comity and the strength of the clause.

CIMB Bank Bhd v World Fuel Services (Singapore) Pte Ltd [2021] SGCA 19

Singapore Court of Appeal considered maritime liens for necessaries (bunker supply), title to sue under transferred bills of lading, and privity/assignment issues in shipping claims.

Nippon Catalyst Pte Ltd v PT Trans-Pacific Petrochemical Indotama [2018] SGHC 126

Under a bill of lading governed by the Hague-Visby Rules, a carrier's obligation to properly load and stow cargo is non-delegable.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Classic Maritime Inc v Limbungan Makmur SDN BHD and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Classic Maritime Inc v Limbung...