Loss of a chance of a better medical outcome is not recoverable as damage in clinical negligence claims.
Tort — Professional Negligence
UKSC refined the SAAMCO scope-of-duty principle and established a six-stage framework for determining recoverable loss in professional negligence claims.
SAAMCO principle confirmed: a professional giving 'information' is only liable for losses attributable to that information being wrong, not all losses flowing from the transaction.
A doctor must disclose material risks that a reasonable patient in their position would consider significant, replacing the Bolam test for informed consent.
Get a detailed analysis of Gregg v Scott and how it applies to your situation.
Explain Gregg v Scott