← All Authorities
United States channelinggovernment employee speechfederal employees

Immigration Judges v. Neal

National Association of Immigration Judges v. Neal, 693 F. Supp. 3d 549 (E.D. Va. 2023)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUnited States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Year2023
StatusPersuasive authority

Key Principle

A federal district court lacks jurisdiction over immigration judges' First Amendment challenge to EOIR's speech policy because the Civil Service Reform Act's comprehensive administrative-review scheme channels such federal-employment disputes away from the district courts (applying Elgin and Fausto).

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

Klein v. Martin 607 U. S. 213 (2026)
Ellingburg v. United States 607 U.S. ___ (2026)
Inc. v. Palmquist 607 U.S. 421 (2026)

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Immigration Judges v. Neal and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Immigration Judges v. Neal