← All Authorities
United States Leading Case jurisdiction

International Shoe Co v Washington

326 U.S. 310 (1945)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year1945
StatusBinding authority

Summary

A defendant must have minimum contacts with a forum state such that maintenance of the suit does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.

Key Principle

"minimum contacts" foundation

Area of Law

Personal Jurisdiction

Related Cases

Ford Motor Co v Montana Eighth Judicial District Court 592 U.S. 351 (2021)

Specific personal jurisdiction exists where a defendant's forum contacts 'relate to' the plaintiff's claims, even without strict causation between those contacts and the injury.

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co v Superior Court of California 582 U.S. 255 (2017)

Specific personal jurisdiction requires a connection between the forum, the defendant, and the particular claims at issue; non-resident plaintiffs in mass-tort suits cannot rely on co-plaintiffs' contacts.

Daimler AG v Bauman 571 U.S. 117 (2014)

General personal jurisdiction over a corporation is limited to forums where it is 'essentially at home', typically its place of incorporation or principal place of business.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of International Shoe Co v Washington and how it applies to your situation.

Explain International Shoe Co v Washin...