← All Authorities
United Kingdom deceitunlawful means conspiracynon reliance clauses

Jinxin v Aser

[2026] EWHC 765 (Comm)
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtHigh Court of England and Wales, King's Bench Division, Commercial Court (Robin Knowles J)
Year2026
StatusPersuasive authority

Key Principle

To succeed in deceit and unlawful means conspiracy arising out of a share sale, a purchaser must prove that the pleaded representations were actually made, were false and dishonestly made, and were relied upon; reliance on negotiated contractual warranties and agreed financial figures, together with non-reliance provisions in the sale agreement, will defeat an alleged reliance on extra-contractual implied representations.

Area of Law

commercial

Related Cases

Maxamcorp International S.L. v Eurotel LLC [2026] EWHC 666 (Comm)
Celestial Aviation Services Ltd v UniCredit Bank GmbH [2026] UKSC 10
R.L. and Republic of Zimbabwe v. Border Timbers Ltd Republic of Zimbabwe v Border Timbers Ltd [2026] UKSC 9

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Jinxin v Aser and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Jinxin v Aser