← All Authorities
United States Leading Case uncategorised

LaRue v DeWolff Boberg & Associates Inc

552 U.S. 248 (2008)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUS Supreme Court
Year2008
StatusBinding authority

Summary

An ERISA individual account plan participant may bring suit under s 502(a)(2) to recover losses to their own account caused by fiduciary breach.

Key Principle

ERISA; individual account plan participant can sue for losses to own account under s 502(a)(2)

Area of Law

employment

Related Cases

Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd (2022) 275 CLR 165

Employee/independent contractor characterisation is determined by the legal rights and obligations in the written contract, not the totality of the relationship.

ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd v Jamsek (2022) 275 CLR 215

HCA confirmed that employee/contractor distinction is determined by contractual terms alone, rejecting the multi-factorial totality-of-relationship test.

WorkPac Pty Ltd v Rossato (2021) 271 CLR 456

A casual employee's status is determined by the contractual terms at engagement; regularity of work pattern does not transform casual employment into permanent employment.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of LaRue v DeWolff Boberg & Associates Inc and how it applies to your situation.

Explain LaRue v DeWolff Boberg & Assoc...