← All Authorities
United States qui tamdouble jeopardyfraud

Marcus v. Hess

United States ex rel. Marcus v. Hess, 317 U.S. 537 (1943)
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
Year1943
StatusBinding authority

Key Principle

The False Claims Act's qui tam provisions authorize 'any person' to sue for fraud that causes the Government to pay false claims, even where the relator relied on a prior public criminal proceeding, and a civil FCA recovery following a criminal conviction for the same conduct does not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause because the civil sanction is remedial rather than punitive.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

Klein v. Martin 607 U. S. 213 (2026)
Ellingburg v. United States 607 U.S. ___ (2026)
Inc. v. Palmquist 607 U.S. 421 (2026)

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of Marcus v. Hess and how it applies to your situation.

Explain Marcus v. Hess