← All Authorities
United Kingdom Leading Case professional negligencecausation legal remoteness

South Australia Asset Management Corp v York Montague Ltd (SAAMCO)

[1997] AC 191
JurisdictionUnited Kingdom
CourtUK House of Lords
Year1997
StatusBinding authority

Summary

A negligent valuer's liability is limited to losses flowing from the information being wrong, not all losses caused by the transaction.

Key Principle

scope of duty; valuer liable only for consequences of the information being wrong, not for all losses

Area of Law

Tort — Professional Negligence

Related Cases

Khan v Meadows [2021] UKSC 21

UKSC refined the SAAMCO scope-of-duty principle and established a six-stage framework for determining recoverable loss in professional negligence claims.

BPE Solicitors v Hughes-Holland [2017] UKSC 21

SAAMCO principle confirmed: a professional giving 'information' is only liable for losses attributable to that information being wrong, not all losses flowing from the transaction.

Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11

A doctor must disclose material risks that a reasonable patient in their position would consider significant, replacing the Bolam test for informed consent.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of South Australia Asset Management Corp v York Montague Ltd (SAAMCO) and how it applies to your situation.

Explain South Australia Asset Manageme...