← All Authorities
Singapore bills of ladingcharterparties

The Dolphina

[2012] 1 SLR 992
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore High Court
Year2012
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Singapore High Court considered admiralty jurisdiction and vessel arrest in context of slot charter arrangements and carrier identification under bills of lading.

Key Principle

admiralty; arrest of vessel; bills of lading; carrier identification; slot charter arrangements

Area of Law

shipping

Related Cases

Compania Sud Americana de Vapores SA v Hin-Pro International Logistics Ltd (2016) 19 HKCFAR 586

An exclusive jurisdiction clause in a bill of lading may be enforced by anti-suit injunction, balancing comity and the strength of the clause.

CIMB Bank Bhd v World Fuel Services (Singapore) Pte Ltd [2021] SGCA 19

Singapore Court of Appeal considered maritime liens for necessaries (bunker supply), title to sue under transferred bills of lading, and privity/assignment issues in shipping claims.

Nippon Catalyst Pte Ltd v PT Trans-Pacific Petrochemical Indotama [2018] SGHC 126

Under a bill of lading governed by the Hague-Visby Rules, a carrier's obligation to properly load and stow cargo is non-delegable.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of The Dolphina and how it applies to your situation.

Explain The Dolphina