← All Authorities
Singapore charterpartiesfreezing injunctions mareva

The Owners of the Vessel Mount Apo v Komercni Banka AS

[2003] SGHC 210
JurisdictionSingapore
CourtSingapore High Court
Year2003
StatusBinding authority

Summary

Arrest of vessel and admiralty jurisdiction considered in relation to beneficial ownership and the associated ship doctrine under Singapore's High Court (Admiralty Jurisdiction) Act.

Key Principle

arrest of vessel; beneficial ownership; associated ship doctrine; admiralty jurisdiction under High Court (Admiralty Jurisdiction) Act

Area of Law

shipping

Related Cases

Compania Sud Americana de Vapores SA v Hin-Pro International Logistics Ltd (2016) 19 HKCFAR 586

An exclusive jurisdiction clause in a bill of lading may be enforced by anti-suit injunction, balancing comity and the strength of the clause.

CIMB Bank Bhd v World Fuel Services (Singapore) Pte Ltd [2021] SGCA 19

Singapore Court of Appeal considered maritime liens for necessaries (bunker supply), title to sue under transferred bills of lading, and privity/assignment issues in shipping claims.

Nippon Catalyst Pte Ltd v PT Trans-Pacific Petrochemical Indotama [2018] SGHC 126

Under a bill of lading governed by the Hague-Visby Rules, a carrier's obligation to properly load and stow cargo is non-delegable.

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of The Owners of the Vessel Mount Apo v Komercni Banka AS and how it applies to your situation.

Explain The Owners of the Vessel Mount...