← All Authorities
United States contemptexecutive privilegeseparation of powers

United States v. Navarro

651 F. Supp. 3d 212
JurisdictionUnited States
CourtUnited States District Court for the District of Columbia
StatusPersuasive authority

Key Principle

A former presidential adviser prosecuted for contempt of Congress under 2 U.S.C. § 192 cannot rely on executive privilege as a defense absent proof that the President actually invoked, or authorized him to invoke, the privilege as to the subpoena.

Area of Law

General

Related Cases

Klein v. Martin 607 U. S. 213 (2026)
Ellingburg v. United States 607 U.S. ___ (2026)
Inc. v. Palmquist 607 U.S. 421 (2026)

Ask CommonBench about this case

Get a detailed analysis of United States v. Navarro and how it applies to your situation.

Explain United States v. Navarro